PETA Eyes Drones to Spy on Hunters

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

By Lauren Russell, CNN

(CNN) — Another animal rights group is shopping for drones it will use to watch for animal abuse — and gun owners are setting their sights in anticipation.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said this week it plans to purchase drones — small, remote-controlled, camera-carrying aircraft — to watch for illegal activity among hunters.

In a press release, PETA said it would “monitor those who are out in the woods with death on their minds,” using spotlights or feed lures, or drinking alcohol while in possession of a firearm. PETA also intends to fly the remote-controlled aircraft over factory farms, fishing spots and “other venues where animals routinely suffer and die,” it said.

The group doesn’t yet have any drones or specific locations where it intends to fly them, and organizers don’t know when they’ll attempt to put them in the air. The organization wants to watch bear hunters, in particular, PETA President Ingrid Newkirk told CNN. Bear hunting is legal, but Newkirk said PETA would look for hunters luring bears with food or killing mothers with cubs at their sides.

“The talk is usually about drones being used as killing machines, but PETA drones will be used to save lives,” Newkirk said in a news release.

In the United States, people can fly model aircraft without approval from the Federal Aviation Administration if they keep the drone in line of sight, lower than 400 feet above ground and away from airports and air traffic. Other types of unmanned aircraft systems need FAA approval, according to the agency.

Newkirk said PETA plans to follow U.S. requirements while flying drones and will fly them overseas, where there may be fewer restrictions. PETA is active in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Hong Kong and India.

As news of PETA’s plan spread, gun owners reacted online. The shooting sports website AmmoLand responded by posting a PETA drone practice target for readers to use at the shooting range.

“Sounds to me like this will create a whole new shooting sport,” the site said. “PETA Drone Target Shooting.”

Readers at the blog Guns.com posted similar comments.

Newkirk said she wasn’t concerned.

“I’d rather have them shoot something inanimate than an innocent doe,” she said. “It’s not the bedroom; it’s the great outdoors, so let’s see what they’re up to.”

It isn’t the first time an animal rights group has considered using drones to track hunters. Showing Animals Respect and Kindness, or SHARK, has launched camera-carrying aircraft hundreds of times to film pigeon shoots, said Steve Hindi, the organization’s president. During pigeon shoots, hunters try to shoot birds after they’re released from cages or mechanically launched. Hindi posts the footage online and sends links to state and local law enforcement, but hasn’t gotten much response.

Twice, SHARK’s drones have been shot while filming pigeon shoots at Wing Pointe shooting resort in Berks County, Pennsylvania, Hindi said. In a press release from November, SHARK said the camera feed went out on a drone camera after a single shot from the shooting range.

State police investigators said they couldn’t identify who shot the drone at Wing Pointe, and couldn’t prove whether it was an accident, said David Beohm, spokesman for the Pennsylvania State Police. Beohm said the drone was flying in airspace restricted by the FAA.

Hindi said he doesn’t believe the shooting was an accident.

“It was a damn good shot,” he said.

CNN contacted Wing Pointe, but representatives declined to comment. Pigeon shoots are legal in Pennsylvania.

Law enforcement officers tried to prevent SHARK from flying a drone in South Carolina in February 2012, Hindi said. A shot brought down the drone soon after it went into the air, and it crashed into a highway, Hindi said.

The Colleton County Sheriff’s Office filed an incident report. It’s still an open case, and no one has been charged.

Hindi said he’s gotten calls from people who say they’ll fly drones over his house. He said he doesn’t care, and that he’ll continue to fly drones as long as it’s legal.

“We have these knee-jerk reactions about drones, when the average person has no worries,” he said.

5 comments

  • sickofit

    I gave up hunting many years ago, NOT because of killing animals, because I decided fishing for large game fish was not as strenuous. If PETA is going to give me something that I can shoot out of the sky and not have to gut it, clean it, or freeze it, WHERE do I apply for a license ?
    The only PETA representative I will discuss this matter with is Pamela Anderson.

  • MyTakeOnIt

    It would be more productive if the Game Commission would use drones to discover or deter illegal activity. Good hunters who follow the rules for level playing field want the bad ones out of commission.

    Like walking in any business or pumping gas at any station, law-abiding people aren't concerned that cameras are watching for the bad guys.

    We could use cameras in restaurant kitchens everywhere though. Some of the crap that goes on there……

    Drones are going to be a fact of life. Just like fumbling through a cell phone by drivers. It ain't never going to stop.

  • Crackshot

    Better explore the privacy Laws….But if PETA wants to waste their time and money on Drones that will almost certain will cost millions and will be brought down with 1 bullet….let them waste their money. Maybe we will get rid of them for good….

  • weimerheimer

    I LOVE animals ……….. right next to my mashed potatoes, gravy, and peas!

    Get real folks!

    Harrassment, any way you look at it, it's HARRASSMENT. Hunters have rights, too.
    Like it or not, folks.

Comments are closed.