Local News

Gov. Corbett apologizes after equating gay marriage to incest

corbett

Republican Governor Tom Corbett apologized Friday in response to a TV interview where he compared same-sex marriage to incest.

Corbett made the comment in response to a question about a statement made by state attorneys in court documents this summer. In the filing, Corbett administration lawyers compared gay and lesbian couples to children, noting that neither may legally marry in Pennsylvania.

“It was an inappropriate analogy, you know,” Corbett said in the TV interview. “I think a much better analogy would have been brother and sister, don’t you?”

Corbett issued a statement on Friday apologizing, explaining his words were not intended to offend anyone.

“I explained that current Pennsylvania statute delineates categories of individuals unable to obtain a marriage license,” Corbett said in a prepared statement.  “As an example, I cited siblings as one such category, which is clearly defined in state law.  My intent was to provide an example of these categories.”

Corbett’s full statement:

“During a recent interview, I was asked to comment on the ruling by Judge Pellegrini that the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts did not have the power to decide the constitutionality of state laws.

“My words were not intended to offend anyone.  If they did, I apologize.

“I explained that current Pennsylvania statute delineates categories of individuals unable to obtain a marriage license.  As an example, I cited siblings as one such category, which is clearly defined in state law.  My intent was to provide an example of these categories.

”The constitutional question is now before a federal court and that is the venue in which same-sex couples wishing to legally marry have standing to intervene and be heard. Same-sex marriage is an important issue and the question of its legal status is one that will be heard and decided upon its merits, with respect and compassion shown to all sides.”

VIEW & ADD COMMENTS

2 Comments to “Gov. Corbett apologizes after equating gay marriage to incest”

    KevinMcGrath said:
    October 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM

    And he should apologize because …. ???? If marriage can be between two men or two women, what exactly is there in the new 'definition' of marriage that would provide a justification for preventing an incestuous marriage? Or a polygamous marriage? Once you take the meaning out of marriage, it can be whatever the majority wants it to be, at least according to the law. I find it hilarious that those who have emptied marriage of its inherent meaning are outraged by people who suggest that 'legal' marriage no longer has any meaning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisement

Advertisement