Judge OKs decision to sell widow’s home over $6.30 debt

(FoxNews)  A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.

The decision last week turned down Eileen Battisti’s request to reverse the September 2011 sale of her home outside Aliquippa in western Pennsylvania.

“I paid everything, and didn’t know about the $6.30,” Battisti said. “For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy.”

Battisti, who still lives in the house, said Monday that she plans to appeal to Commonwealth Court. That court earlier ordered an evidentiary hearing, which led to last week’s ruling.

Beaver County Common Pleas Judge Gus Kwidis wrote that the county tax claim bureau complied with notification requirements in state law before the auction. She had previously owed other taxes, but at the time of the sale she owed just $235, including other interest and fees.

“There is no doubt that (she) had actual receipt of the notification of the tax upset sale on July 7, 2011, and Aug. 16, 2011,” the judge wrote. “Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned.”

The property sold for about $116,000, and most of that money will be paid to Battisti if further appeals are unsuccessful. An attorney for the purchaser did not return a phone message on Monday.

Joe Askar, Beaver County’s chief solicitor, said the judge got the decision right, based on the law.

“The county never wants to see anybody lose their home, but at the same time the tax sale law, the tax real estate law, doesn’t give a whole lot of room for error, either,” Askar said.

Battisti said her husband handled the paperwork for the property’s taxes before he passed away in 2004.

“It’s bad — she had some hard times, I guess her husband kind of took care of a lot of that stuff,” Askar said. “It seemed that she was having a hard time coping with the loss of her husband — that just made it set in a little more.”


  • MyTakeOnIt

    Kind of stupid in two respects: Six Dollars? and You really ignored the notices for the SIX DOLLARS?
    I cannot figure out which party is dumber.

  • Joe

    People must realize they do not own their homes. They merely rent from the municipalities and school districts. If you miss by just $1.00 you face eviction and sheriff's sale. The lady seems not to have paid attention.

  • yupp

    Why didn't someone from the tax authority just knock on her door before it got to the point of sheriff sale? This is case of local government failure.

  • Yorker

    Elderly people are well known to do things like hide their mail, particularly when the deceased spouse is the one who handled the finances. Many local governments have fail safe procedures for such situations, this is apparently not one.

    Our property tax situation in Pennsylvania seems like it is something out of the Dark Ages, probably owing to municipalities being like a collection of so many fiefdoms.

Comments are closed.